Google Illegally Acted As A Search Monopoly, Judge Rules In Major Case

Forbes Business Breaking Google Illegally Acted As A Search Monopoly, Judge Rules In Major Case Brian Bushard Forbes Staff Brian is a Boston-based Forbes breaking news reporter. Following Aug 5, 2024, 03:18pm EDT Updated Aug 5, 2024, 04:02pm EDT Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Topline A federal judge ruled on Monday
Google Illegally Acted As A Search Monopoly, Judge Rules In Major Case

Google Illegally Acted As A Search Monopoly, Judge Rules In Major Case

Following

Updated Aug 5, 2024, 04:02pm EDT

Topline

A federal judge ruled on Monday Google violated antitrust laws in a bid to maintain a monopoly with its search engine—a major loss for Google, capping off the latest antitrust case brought against a U.S. tech giant.

Key Facts

D.C.-based Judge Amit Mehta wrote “Google is a monopolist” and “has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” in an opinion siding with the Department of Justice and 11 states.

In his ruling, Mehta stated Google exercises monopoly power over product markets, uses exclusive distribution agreements and charges “supracompetitive prices for general search text ads,” which Mehta argues has led to “anticompetitive behavior.”

The case marks the latest antitrust suit against a U.S. tech conglomerate, and comes less than a year after Google agreed to a $700 million settlement in a separate suit for allegedly forcing app makers to use its payment system on its Play Store marketplace— Apple, Amazon and Facebook parent Meta have also faced antitrust suits in recent years.

Following Monday’s ruling, Mehta is now tasked with deciding what actions Google must take to remedy alleged antitrust violations, a potentially major consequence for the $2 trillion tech company that spends billions of dollars each year on its search engine.

Forbes has reached out to Google for comment.

Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here.

Key Background

The DOJ brought the case in October 2020, along with the attorneys general of Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, South Carolina and Texas. Plaintiffs claimed Google—the search engine conglomerate under parent company Alphabet—implemented “anticompetitive and exclusionary practices” to maintain its search engine monopoly, claiming Google makes up nearly 90% of Americans’ online search queries—Google disputed that estimate. Specifically, the case states Google entered exclusionary agreements with tech companies to “lock up the primary avenues through which users access search engines,” requiring Google be used as the default search engine on mobile phones and computers.

Tangent

Alphabet had already undergone a disappointing day on Wall Street, with its shares opening down 6%, as investors pulled shares on the heels of a concerning jobs report, and as recession concerns bubble up. Alphabet, along with tech giants such as Nvidia, Meta and Apple, all saw major losses Monday morning as the Dow Jones dropped nearly 3%, the Nasdaq lost over 3.5% and the S&P 500 fell over 3%. Alphabet’s shares continued to fall in the afternoon, approaching close with a 4.2% loss on the day.

Further Reading

ForbesGoogle Will Pay $700 Million To Settle Antitrust Suit-And Will Change Play Store Billing

Send me a secure  tip
Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply
Related Posts
Female stalker, 44, who bugged her ex-boyfriend’s car and redirected his mail to ‘expose him as benefits cheat’ avoids prison after judge says she was ‘wronged’ by him claiming to be jobless to pay less child support
Read More

Female stalker, 44, who bugged her ex-boyfriend’s car and redirected his mail to ‘expose him as benefits cheat’ avoids prison after judge says she was ‘wronged’ by him claiming to be jobless to pay less child support

A female stalker who bugged her ex-boyfriend's car, redirected his mail and accused him of being a benefits cheat in a bid to get extra child support, has avoided prison.  Veronica Jackson, 44, placed a tracker on the vehicle of absentee father Kevin McCormack and diverted his letters to a drop-off location in a bid to