Feud Flares Between U.S. and Global Antidoping Agency

Since the World Anti-Doping Agency first came under scrutiny this spring for its handling of positive tests for banned substances by nearly two dozen Chinese swimmers, the United States has been the agency’s chief critic. Congress has threatened to cut funding for the agency, which is known as WADA. The Justice Department and F.B.I. have
Feud Flares Between U.S. and Global Antidoping Agency

Since the World Anti-Doping Agency first came under scrutiny this spring for its handling of positive tests for banned substances by nearly two dozen Chinese swimmers, the United States has been the agency’s chief critic.

Congress has threatened to cut funding for the agency, which is known as WADA. The Justice Department and F.B.I. have opened criminal investigations into how the tests were handled. And the head of the United States Anti-Doping Agency and American swimmers have raised doubts about whether WADA can be trusted to do its job.

On Wednesday, WADA launched its latest counterattack on the Americans, accusing the United States Anti-Doping Agency, known as USADA, of doing the same thing it has accused WADA of: failing to strictly follow the rules when an athlete tests positive for a banned drug.

In a lengthy statement, WADA said that USADA had gone against the global antidoping code a decade ago by allowing athletes who had tested positive because of food contamination to continue competing.

,

WADA acknowledged a wrinkle in the case — that the athletes in question were allowed to keep competing so they could work undercover to help authorities with a criminal investigation — but said it did not matter because the U.S. agency was still bound to follow the rules and had failed to get WADA’s approval.

“In one case, an elite level athlete, who competed at Olympic qualifier and international events in the United States, admitted to taking steroids and EPO yet was permitted to continue competing all the way up to retirement,” WADA said, referring to two categories of banned drugs. “Their case was never published, results never disqualified, prize money never returned and no suspension ever served. The athlete was allowed to line up against their unknowing competitors as if they had never cheated.”

Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply
Related Posts
Hurricane Ernesto Could Form Tonight: Where Forecasters Say Next Hurricane Will Hit
Read More

Hurricane Ernesto Could Form Tonight: Where Forecasters Say Next Hurricane Will Hit

Forbes Business Breaking Hurricane Ernesto Could Form Tonight: Where Forecasters Say Next Hurricane Will Hit Brian Bushard Forbes Staff Brian is a Boston-based Forbes breaking news reporter. Following Aug 13, 2024, 05:53pm EDT Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Topline Forecasters warn an intensifying Caribbean tropical storm will strengthen into the next
Andy Murray fans’ delight on both sides of the Channel as tennis legend extends his career… just about, as two-time gold medallist clinches nailbiting Olympics comeback at Paris 2024 in arena with plenty of empty seats but Brits leading the cheers
Read More

Andy Murray fans’ delight on both sides of the Channel as tennis legend extends his career… just about, as two-time gold medallist clinches nailbiting Olympics comeback at Paris 2024 in arena with plenty of empty seats but Brits leading the cheers

Andy Murray fans rejoiced as their hero kept hopes of a swansong career finish alive with a sensational comeback at Paris 2024. Team GB supporters hailed the two-time Olympic gold medallist, who fought off five match points with his partner Dan Evans against Japan's Kei Nishikori and Taro Daniel in the men's doubles on Sunday. Murray