Federal Appeals Court Upholds Maryland’s Ban on Semiautomatic Rifles

A federal appeals court rejected an effort by gun control opponents to throw out Maryland’s ban on semiautomatic rifles like the AR-15, setting up a potential challenge that could further define the limits of the Supreme Court’s sweeping expansion of gun rights in 2022. By a margin of 10 to 5, the U.S. Court of
Federal Appeals Court Upholds Maryland’s Ban on Semiautomatic Rifles

A federal appeals court rejected an effort by gun control opponents to throw out Maryland’s ban on semiautomatic rifles like the AR-15, setting up a potential challenge that could further define the limits of the Supreme Court’s sweeping expansion of gun rights in 2022.

By a margin of 10 to 5, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Va., ruled that the ban did not violate the Second Amendment right to bear arms, or run afoul of requirements that any restriction on firearms ownership be rooted in historical tradition as required by the 2022 ruling, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.

Maryland’s decade-old assault weapons ban falls outside Second Amendment protections because rapid-firing long guns “are military-style weapons designed for sustained combat operations that are ill-suited and disproportionate to the need for self-defense,” wrote Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan.

“We decline to wield the Constitution to declare that military-style armaments, which have become primary instruments of mass killing and terrorist attacks in the United States, are beyond the reach of our nation’s democratic processes,” Judge Wilkinson added in an exhaustive 183-page ruling made public on Tuesday.

,

Lawyers for one of the main plaintiffs in the case, the Firearms Policy Coalition, said they would ask the Supreme Court to review the case. Their efforts to seek a ruling from the justices before the decision were rebuffed.

In their dissent, the five judges in the minority — all appointed by Republican presidents — accused the majority of ignoring Bruen and other precedents.

Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply
Related Posts
Warner Brothers Discovery sues NBA over Amazon rights deal
Read More

Warner Brothers Discovery sues NBA over Amazon rights deal

Warner Brothers Discovery filed a lawsuit against the NBA on Friday, claiming the US professional basketball league broke a contract by refusing a new media rights deal to accept an offer from Amazon. The move in New York Supreme Court comes two days after the NBA signed new, 11-year rights deals worth nearly $76 billion
New whistleblower allegations reveal law enforcement offered drones to secure Trump rally – but were DENIED by Secret Service before deadly shooting
Read More

New whistleblower allegations reveal law enforcement offered drones to secure Trump rally – but were DENIED by Secret Service before deadly shooting

Secret Service stood in the way of using drone technology to survey the scene of the Butler rally where an assassin tried to shoot former President Donald Trump, according to a whistleblower.  Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., revealed that one whistleblower had told his office the night before the rally Secret Service 'repeatedly denied offers from